Showing posts with label Omaha. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Omaha. Show all posts

Friday, March 26, 2021

2021 NCAA Men's Hockey Tournament: Why Your Team Can Win It All (Loveland Regional)

Enough parity exists in the NCAA Men's Hockey Tournament where at least one No. 4 seed has upset a No. 1 seed in every tournament played since 2005. The unexpected is more than expected. It is no surprise, in an era where the final at-large bid has won three of the last seven national titles, to see any of the 16 teams reach the Frozen Four.

Makes bracket challenges fun and impossible, even before playing in a global pandemic.

So with that in mind, I thought it would be best to preview the 2021 NCAA Men's Hockey Tournament by showcasing two non-pandemic extremes. First, why each team can win the national championship. Second, why each team will be upset and lose in round 1. Add three players to watch and a "chip on their shoulders" ranking (1 being none and 10 being wanting to prove the world wrong) and there's a preview that covers the bases for your bracket challenge. 

This is the fourth and final regional preview. Wednesday featured the Fargo Regional. Yesterday (Thursday) featured both the Bridgeport Regional and Albany Regional.

Loveland Regional

No. 1 Seed: Minnesota

Why the Gophers will win it all: Minnesota (23-6-0) plays disciplined hockey and has several paths to victory in a testing tournament that culminates the Centennial Season of Gopher Hockey with a regional in the Centennial State.

Whether it is the goal-scoring consistency of Sampo Ranta, who has 18 goals, the depth of seven players with 20+ points, or goaltender Jack LaFontaine's Hobey Baker top-ten finalist performance this season (.936% save percentage and five shutouts), Minnesota makes itself a tough out. The Gophers continued last season's second-half push into a perfect 10-0-0 start before the rest of the conference made headway. 

The Gophers won three games in three days - including a pair of comeback OT wins - to take home the Big Ten conference tournament championship. Each game seemed to have a different hero - Bryce Brodzinski and Blake McLaughlin playing his best hockey are two examples - which speaks to the depth on Bob Motzko's team. A young blue line full of puck movers has played well above its age. Minnesota earned its No. 1 seed, playing like the team Motzko envisioned and recruited when taking over the program three years ago.

Why the Gophers will be upset in round 1: Minnesota gets better as the weekend goes on, which is both the sign of an elite team and a bad sign in a single-elimination tournament where it takes one bad night to end a season.

The Gophers lost four of its six games in the first game of a two-game series. In the Big Ten tournament, it was Michigan State who made Minnesota sweat in the opening game. Historically, Minnesota has struggled outside the state of Minnesota in the NCAA Tournament, having not won a regional game outside MN since 2007 (the last time the Gophers played in Colorado). While the Gophers are undefeated when scoring first, Omaha did defeat top-ranked North Dakota twice in six games. 

Chip on their shoulder ranking: 6. I'm sure Minnesota will have a chip on its shoulder after the way the Big Ten regular-season ended and returning to the NCAA Tournament for the first time since 2017. The Gophers play well when having one, but the team does not have the same argument as others in this region.

Three Players To Watch: #45 G- Jack LaFontaine (CAR), #58 F- Sampo Ranta, #9 F- Sammy Walker (TBL)


No. 2 Seed: Minnesota State 

Why the (Purple) Mavericks will win it all: No goaltender has shut teams down like Minnesota State (20-4-1) goalie Dryden McKay this season.

The junior leads the nation with nine shutouts - the gap between first and second would be tied for fourth - in 23 starts and a 1.40 GAA. His outstanding play is to be expected to the point where the few games teams have been able to score multiple goals stand out for the accomplishment.

It also helps the Mavericks control possession like no other team. On average, Minnesota State outshoots opponents by over 15 shots per game. (Second place is ~10 shots per game.) Mike Hastings continues to reload with diamonds in the rough, with Cade Borchardt, Nathan Smith and Akiro Hirose as underclassmen shining through. Another newbie is senior Todd Burgess, who transferred from RPI, to go with a large senior class that missed a chance at redemption last season. Minnesota State's consistency is on a level few can match recently. It would be fitting for the Mavericks to end with a reward.

Why the Mavericks will be upset in round 1: Do you know the history of Minnesota State in the NCAA Tournament? If yes, just skip to the next section.

If not, well...the Mavericks remain looking for an elusive NCAA Tournament win. The past two attempts saw Minnesota State with multi-goal leads early before eventually losing. Again, this is a new year and one that does not see Providence in Providence, but the legend of the first win grows bigger with each passing tournament. Maybe that game already happened after Northern Michigan jumped out to a 5-0 lead within two periods in the WCHA conference tournament semifinal. Maybe it was just a sign to come.

Chip on their shoulder ranking: 10. Easy 10. The history, the seeing last season's tournament canceled, the not being a No. 1 seed this year despite running through the WCHA and having the best record nationally, easterners questioning the WCHA, the fact it's been 20 years and Mankato State still slips through...all of it is enough to place the Mavericks at the maximum chip on their shoulders. You've earned it.

Three Players To Watch: #8 F- Nathan Smith (WPG), #5 F- Jake Jaremko (Undrafted), #29 G- Dryden McKay (Undrafted)


No. 3 Seed: Quinnipiac

Why the Bobcats will win it all: Perhaps because Quinnipiac (17-7-4) spent the season playing in a 4...then 3...then 2 team league, several QU players seem to be flying under the radar. Rand Pecknold continues to recruit well. The team is fourth in goal margin. Ty Smilanic had one of the best rookie seasons nationally, scoring 14 goals in 28 games. Peter DiLiberatore returned, being an all-around top D, while Wyatt Bongiovanni returns after missing much of the season. He has 5 goals in 8 games played.

The most underrated player nationally might be senior Odeen Tufto, who sits second in points with 45. The Mat Barzal of New Haven County creates plays from the tiniest of openings. Then there's Zach Metsa, whose 26 points leads all blueliners nationally, and Keith Petruzzelli having a Mike Richter Award finalist season.

There was a lot to like about this year's Quinnipiac team when it was March 2020. Weird year aside, there is still a lot to like about this year's Quinnipiac team's chances.

Why the Bobcats will lose in round 1: A combination of the unknown and known.

Quinnipiac enters the NCAA Tournament coming off its most embarrassing loss of the season, losing the ECAC championship in OT to St. Lawrence. Almost every team has a bad loss, however, and QU is 7-2-1 in its last 10 games. Still, with the limited and strange schedule the Bobcats played - QU went 2-2-2 against Clarkson - it's tough to know where Quinnipiac stacks up against the rest of the country.

For the known, this upcoming game features the only two teams sharing a common opponent. Both Minnesota State and Quinnipiac faced Bowling Green. While the Mavericks made quick work of the Falcons, sweeping the WCHA foe, BGSU swept Quinnipiac. If that is any indication, then it might be an easy night for the Mavericks.

Chip on their shoulder ranking: 7.5. Shouldering the weight of the ECAC and wanting to prove QU belongs is enough of a chip on their shoulder to push Quinnipiac into the upper tier.

Three Players To Watch: #29 F- Odeen Tufto (undrafted), #96 F- Ty Smilanic (FLA), #3 D- Peter DiLiberatore (VGK)


No. 4 Seed: Omaha

Why the (Red) Mavericks will win it all: In the words of the great Mike Eidelbess, "And then there's Omaha..."

The 16th and final profile comes from a team whose last NCAA Tournament appearance (2015) resulted in an unexpected Frozen Four run. Don't count Omaha (14-10-1) this time around either. The Mavericks own a pair of wins over North Dakota and have been a tough out for any opponent. The team is 11-1-0 when scoring first this season.

Omaha's run to the 2021 NCAA Tournament comes from a consistent season, beating the teams it should. Isaiah Saville has been the goaltender Omaha expected when he came on campus as the USHL Goaltender of the Year. The junior line of Tyler Weiss-Chase Primeau-Taylor Ward leads the way offensively although Mike Gabinet's group is more than a one-line team. Five different players have eight or more goals.

Why the Mavericks will lose in round 1: Of the teams still playing, no one has struggled of late quite like the Mavericks. 

Omaha, who went 3-6-1 against the other three remaining NCHC teams, enters the NCAA Tournament having lost four of its last five games, including an NCHC Quarterfinal appearance against Denver. In fairness, the other four games came against No. 1 overall seed North Dakota, but it's not the bit of confidence any team would like when it comes to the biggest stage of the year.

Including Notre Dame, 15 of the top 16 teams in goal margin over the past 10 games made the NCAA Tournament. The lone tournament team not among the top 16? Omaha, who sits tied for 31st (-4). The Mavericks are also one of three teams still playing with a negative shot margin and the one with the worst. Facing a Minnesota team who picks up momentum the longer it plays, that might be a sign of trouble.

Chip on their shoulder ranking: 7. Being the fourth seed can be enough reason to have a chip on your shoulder and wanting to prove teams wrong. Entering the NCAA Tournament the way the Mavericks did up the factor to at least a 7.

Three Players to Watch: #40 F- Tyler Weiss (COL), #31 G- Isaiah Saville (VGK), #17 F- Taylor Ward (undrafted)

--

If you enjoyed this blog, you can follow Nate on Twitter and like/subscribe to his Facebook page. Thanks!

Monday, March 22, 2021

Bracketology Postmortem: Answering The 2021 NCAA Men's Hockey Tournament's Biggest Questions

The bracket is out and it is time for a little bracketology postmortem.

Here's the actual bracket:

Fargo:
1. North Dakota vs. 4. AIC
2. Michigan vs. 3. Minnesota Duluth

Albany:
1. Boston College vs. 4. Notre Dame
2. St. Cloud State vs. 3. Boston University

Loveland:
1. Minnesota vs. 4. Omaha
2. Minnesota State vs. 3. Quinnipiac

Bridgeport:
1. Wisconsin vs. 4. Bemidji State
2. Massachusetts vs. 3. Lake Superior State

All in all, I am happy with my results considering the circumstances. Taking out St. Lawrence, who sadly announced after posting the final bracket that it would not be appearing in the NCAA Tournament due to a positive Covid case (always a possibility this year), means 14 of the 15 teams appearing on my list made the NCAA Tournament. It would be 15 of 16 taking out St. Lawrence, as my first team out was Bemidji State and I had the Beavers replacing the Saints. The committee did have BSU higher than me, meaning it was an easy call to include Bemidji State and have all five Minnesota men's hockey D1 schools in for the first time in history.

Omaha was in fact the fourth NCHC team. Michigan was in fact the highest of the third teams, earning the last No. 2 seed. Michigan-UMD in Fargo will be happening, and Boston College did end up in Albany instead of Bridgeport due to crowds being allowed in the former. Quinnipiac got in as a No. 3 seed, even before jumping up and taking the ECAC automatic bid. Several other ideas happened, just with different teams.

The only miss was Notre Dame getting in as the fourth Big Ten team instead of the fourth Hockey East team. While I had UMass Lowell getting in over Providence, the selection committee had PC ahead (the Friars are an alternate if any other team withdraws before Monday night) and went with the "neither" option. That was a miss. I was also more positive on the Fighting Irish's chances than most and am not surprised to see ND get in, but at the end of the day, I can't claim to have Notre Dame in my field.

There were also subjective misses in seeding. And I did not expect so much travel or an 11/5 West-East split from the selection committee based on what the committee had been saying pre-tournament.

So let's get into answering the questions. Mike Kemp, the NCAA Tournament selection committee chair, spoke to several outlets and cleared up some of the subjective criteria the committee used to decide the final at-large bids and seeding. You can check that out at both College Hockey News and USCHO.

1. Omaha, Denver, or both?

It was in fact Omaha. The Mavericks' record and performance were enough to get in over Denver having the better head-to-head record and a better resume than its record indicates. Looking at how the bracket turned out, the option for both and five NCHC teams was not a popular one.

2. Bemidji State, Bowling Green, both, or neither?

The Beavers get the nod over Bowling Green. According to Kemp, Bemidji State's better record against Minnesota State and Lake Superior State put the Beavers ahead of the Falcons. BGSU had a slightly better RPI and wins over Quinnipiac, which in a non-subjective year helps its case, but not this time around. That made all the difference in the world. In the end, a third WCHA team this season was ahead of the fourth team in other conferences, but a fourth was below the other conference's fourth team. Bemidji State is slated as the best of the "final three" at-large bids without Quinnipiac.

Credit where it's due to the WCHA fans and writers that correctly had the case for a third WCHA team - something the league has not had since realignment - being stronger than it appeared. I had it lower.

3. Providence, UMass Lowell, UConn, or how does the East/West split go?

So it turns out the answer was "Neither." UMass Lowell was playing for, in hindsight, either Omaha or Boston University's spot with the Hockey East automatic bid. Despite the RiverHawks reaching the conference tournament championship game and losing 1-0, the committee kept Providence as the fourth HE team. However, the Friars' record and other factors that will be discussed later kept PC behind other conferences.

11 Western teams versus 5 Eastern teams is a win for western politicking. Perception has the west as the better side of the country this season, however, perception does not always equal reality. Pre-St. Lawrence news, the split was 10/6 West-East, which is on the high side yet makes more sense than 11/5. When given the chance to replace one eastern team with another, the selection committee chose a western team in Notre Dame. All three of the final at-large spots were western teams.

As much as the final at-large spots are tough decisions, I figured politicking would make the East/West split closer.

4. Can a second team from a conference get a No. 1 seed? Does Minnesota State's loss to Northern Michigan knock the Mavericks out of the top four?

Yes and yes.

This section features several compromises and shows how small decisions change the bracket. The committee was open to ranking a second team from the same conference as a No. 1 seed, as Wisconsin earned the fourth No. 1 seed alongside Big Ten conference mate Minnesota.

Not only that but Massachusetts, the second Hockey East team, was ahead of the top WCHA team, Minnesota State. The Mavericks ended up sixth and head to No. 3 overall seed Minnesota's region, Loveland. If the compromise is a lower top overall seed for Minnesota State and three WCHA teams in the NCAA Tournament overall, it's a good one for the league. The Big Ten gets two No. 1 seeds of the four but the two hardest paths to the Frozen Four.

I also like how the decision of whether Wisconsin or Massachusetts should earn the last No. 1 seed ends up with both teams in the same region. That was something I also had in my bracket (albeit Minnesota State and Wisconsin) and think it's important in this subjective year. 

In addition to the two Big Ten teams, North Dakota was named the No. 1 overall seed while Boston College is No. 2 overall. BC being ahead of Minnesota is something I did not have yet completely understand based upon the entire season of work. It was a close call. Either option can be justified while not changing the locale of the two (thanks to Denver being out).

5. Does the committee go with bracket integrity or try and limit travel as much as possible?

Integrity by a landslide.

There were absolutely no attempts to limit travel and flights in a global pandemic. 11 of 16 teams will be flying, including three into Bridgeport. Quinnipiac is playing in Loveland while Lake Superior State goes to Bridgeport, Bemidji State is Bridgeport and AIC in Fargo, and Michigan heads to Fargo while Minnesota State goes to Loveland. 

If travel was truly an issue, the number of flights could be cut down by 2-6 while staying in the seeding bands. With North Dakota being the No. 1 overall seed and placed where it would be regardless, and knowing how the rest of the No. 1 seeds are ranked, it's pretty safe to say that the bracket is a straight 1-16, 2-15, etc. ranking. Kemp insinuated as much on the USCHO podcast.

(Obviously, a different selection committee, but I'm going to remember this choice the next time Minnesota/Wisconsin/Minnesota Duluth all have to play one another in the NCAA Women's Hockey Tournament to save a flight or two. Those years where it was a #2 vs. #5 overall look 100x worse now.)

6. How does the committee sort out Michigan/Boston University/Minnesota Duluth?

Michigan, Minnesota Duluth, Boston University in that order. 

Selfishly, I am a fan of Michigan and Minnesota Duluth playing one another on the ten-year tournament anniversary of the two meeting for the 2011 NCAA national championship.

7. How badly does Quinnipiac's loss to St. Lawrence hurt the Bobcats? Does it cost QU an at-large bid?

Turns out the committee kept Quinnipiac in the above tier, or just outside, as the Bobcats were slotted right below Boston University.

8. Who gets the last at-large bid?

Notre Dame. Well, Omaha first. Then Notre Dame.

St. Lawrence dropping out slotted in the Fighting Irish, which should be something to watch out for in a tournament filled with enough party where the final at-large bid has won three of the last seven NCAA Tournaments. (Only slightly joking: Road Notre Dame is a tough out.)

The Fighting Irish, and Omaha and Bemidji State before that, were beneficiaries of the committee putting record against teams in the NCAA Tournament ahead of other factors. Notre Dame was 4-7-1 against the other three Big Ten NCAA Tournament teams. Bemidji State was 4-5-2. Omaha, meanwhile, had a 3-6-1 record against the top-three NCHC teams compared to Denver's 2-9-0 record.

Providence had a 1-5-2 record against the three Hockey East NCAA Tournament teams (and the one win came against BU), which dropped the Friars below the "in" crowd.

So what did we learn?

We learned quite a few things.

We learned that the selection committee values wins against top teams more than the Pairwise. There used to be a "Teams Under Consideration" component that played a role in ranking, but it has not appeared in recent years.

We learned limiting travel is overrated.

We learned the WCHA can get in three teams just in time for the CCHA. We learned Hockey East can in three teams just in time for the ECAC to get back all its teams.

We learned the Hockey Gods have a sense of humor with Minnesota Duluth-Michigan, Minnesota State-Quinnipiac, and Boston College-Notre Dame.

We learned gifting teams by part of the country was not something the selection committee wanted to do. When tasked with comparing one another, the region did not matter.

We learned that for all the fears of the Big Ten being such a powerful conference and taking over the sport, it was a big surprise to see the league get everything to go its way. Two of four No. 1 seeds, the last No. 2 seed, and a fourth team for the first time over the fourth team from other conferences. The selection committee certainly thought highly of the Big Ten this season.

And we learned that, while flawed at times, the Pairwise rankings and knowing the criteria in advance are things the college hockey world needs. Maybe with some changes taking the good from this year to improve the flaws, however, it wasn't the worst thing to have a one-year break to better appreciate what we already have.

Thank you everyone for following along with bracketology this year.

Friday, March 19, 2021

Bracketology: Why Your Team Deserves To Make The 2021 NCAA Men's Hockey Tournament (Or Not)

For the first time in a generation, NCAA hockey teams need to showcase their body of work and sell accomplishments to the selection committee. 

It's new. It's different. College hockey coaches on the NCAA Tournament bubble have stopped being polite and started using postgame pressers to stump for why their team is worthy and their opponents should be sitting at home eating popcorn and watching TV. 

And honestly? Not every team knows how to do it.

Take this attempt by Bowling Green, one of several WCHA teams fighting for 1-2 NCAA Tournament spots.



Active scorers? The NCAA Tournament does not constitute a lifetime achievement award. This isn't the Hobey Baker. 

C'mon Bowling Green, lead with the fact the Falcons beat Quinnipiac twice at Quinnipiac! Lead with the 20 wins, or the 10-4-1 road record, or the sweep over Michigan Tech, or the 3.48 goals per game and +10.03 shot differential that is second in the WCHA behind Minnesota State! Don't bring up active scorers. It helps BGSU as much as bringing up the 6-8-1 finish, first-round series loss to Northern Michigan, and losses to nearly every WCHA team in the hunt. You need to sell yourself, Bowling Green. NCAA Tournament bids are not just handed out!

As a public service, I am going to help 14 other teams on the NCAA Tournament bubble with their resumes. Unlike the rest of these programs, I come with plenty of experience writing resumes. #HireNate

In alphabetical order:

Army: 

Point out: Atlantic Hockey has won three straight first-round series. In a year where there are few true non-conference games and a limited ECAC, why shouldn't Atlantic Hockey get a second bid? The league has proven itself in the NCAA Tournament. The Black Knights are 15-5-0 this season, a better win/loss record than many on the bubble, and help shore up the East-West split if the team beats Canisius and proves it is the second-best AHA team. (This blueprint can also be used for Canisius if the Golden Griffins beat Army Friday.)

Avoid: Discussing the 1-3 record against AIC, who hasn't played since January, or the loss to a first-year LIU. The Sharks did not exist this time last year. Maybe the committee does not know about Long Island in the way the Hobey committee (but not Toronto fans) do not about Colin Bilek.

Bemidji State:

Point out: Of all the WCHA teams fighting behind Minnesota State for a spot, Bemidji State has the best record. Of the Mavericks' three losses, two came against Bemidji, who also went 3-1-0 against Bowling Green. The win total is not boosted by Division III wins or four games against Ferris State and Alabama Huntsville. It is a legit WCHA strength of schedule. Maybe sweeten with Zach Driscoll's performance in the net or the fact that the state of Minnesota has never gotten all five schools in the men's NCAA hockey tournament.

Avoid: Being swept by Northern Michigan, or losing two of three in March to Lake Superior State if the Lakers go on to win Friday in the WCHA Conference Tournament semifinal. Or that one of those Minnesota State wins saw the Beavers outshot 36-10 and score 4 goals on 10 shots against not Dryden McKay.

Boston University: 

Point out: How the Terriers' lack of experience is not a detriment. Boston University only played 15 games this season and was without key players for several. Finishing 10-4-1 with wins over UMass and Boston College helps immensely. Plus with that record and results, which also includes a sweep of Providence, who else out East deserves a spot over Boston University? Hockey East is not getting only two teams.

Avoid: Discussing the Hockey East tournament loss to UMass-Lowell. Even though rival BC also lost, it's not a good look. Nor is the -7.47 shots on goal margin per game (43rd of 51 teams). BU has won yet those wins come at the expense of a possession stat that sees the Terriers surrounded by bottom feeders.

Connecticut:

Point Out: The better Hockey East record and wins in regulations. All 10 victories came in regulations. The Huskies have a 0-3-2 record in overtime and a 1-1-1 record against Boston College. Against Providence in the regular season, Connecticut went 2-1-0. Maybe also bring up the season Jonny Evans is having since it flew a little under the radar.

Avoid: Saying anything about the 6-1 Hockey East quarterfinal loss to Providence, who is in position with the Huskies to take a fourth Hockey East bid. Or how it dropped UConn below .500 this season while UMass Lowell sits above .500 even with a loss in the Hockey East championship game. 

Denver:

Point out: Head-to-head matchups. If the NCHC deserves four teams, and the argument comes down between Denver and Omaha for that fourth spot, well the Pioneers went 3-2-0 against Omaha. DU also won at the most important time, playing with 16 skaters in the NCHC Conference Tournament. Add two wins over North Dakota and no one being quite sure how overtime losses work - Denver is 0-3-1 with the extra period - and DU can punch above its weight to try and extend the nation's longest NCAA Tournament streak. It would not be the first time someone gets a job without the qualifications.

Avoid: Bringing up the full sub-.500 record or the bad with the good. Say nothing about how the two North Dakota wins can be contrasted with losses to the two worst NCHC teams, Colorado College and Miami. Same with the 0-4-0 record against Minnesota Duluth and St. Cloud State. A lot of teams just missing the NCAA Tournament in a normal year look to be among the top-16 best teams while ending up on the outside, a bad loss or two away from being a No. 3 seed. That is exactly where Denver sits, but this is a year where Pairwise does not make the math rules.

Lake Superior State:

Point out: Play down the stretch. The Lakers are 11-1-0 in its last 12 games. While that is technically not a part of the criteria, the subjective human element seems to be a fan of how teams leave last impressions. Not only that, but the Lakers can avenge the one loss by defeating Bemidji State in the WCHA semifinals. Doing so might be enough to end one of the longest NCAA Tournament droughts, as Lake Superior State has not been in since 1996 when Jeff Jackson still coached.

Avoid: Discussing how the 17-6-3 record looks better on paper than in reality. Two of those wins come against Division III Adrian. Four came against Alabama Huntsville and three more were against Northern Michigan. The Lakers did not play Minnesota State on the road and went 1-2-1 against Bemidji State. LSSU did play well against Bowling Green, but so did several other teams. Not that Lake Superior State needs someone to tell the Lakers, but avoiding a loss Friday would help the resume stand out big time.

Massachusetts Lowell:

Point out: How things are coming up Milhouse for the RiverHawks. The new skill of upsetting Hockey East teams named Boston (University and College) when it matters makes UMass Lowell an at-large spoiler for a potential fourth Hockey East bid. One more win over Massachusetts and it's a guarantee. If last impressions make a difference, playing while Providence and Connecticut sit at home make a final statement.

Avoid: Making comparisons. No matter what happens Saturday night, UMass Lowell finishes above .500, doing so with a lineup without a double-digit goal scorer, and in a time where the options for Eastern teams are limited. If the RiverHawks lose, there are plenty of comparisons that put Providence ahead of UMass Lowell for a fourth Hockey East spot. Asking for a fifth might be a bridge too far for the RiverHawks.

Northern Michigan: 

Point Out: Multiple wins against Bowling Green, Bemidji State, and a win over Lake Superior State. Sing the praises of that 2021 WCHA conference tournament semifinalist appearance (at worst) in the "accomplishments" section.

Avoid: Losing? Honestly, the Wildcats sit in a spot where the team needs an automatic bid to get in the NCAA Tournament. Losing to either Minnesota State or the Bemidji State/Lake Superior State winner does very little to help those options. 11-17-1 will not put Northern Michigan in an at-large bid 

Notre Dame:

Point out: It's been a good year for the Big Ten and the Fighting Irish, with a 14-13-2 record, end the season with a good record. Notre Dame swept Minnesota and Michigan on the road. None of the wins in OT while several losses did. If finishing strong matters, Jeff Jackson's current team ended the year 4-1-1 with dominating wins. If location matters when deciding whether a fourth Big Ten team makes sense in an NCAA Tournament searching for eastern teams, Indiana is further east than Nebraska or Colorado.

Avoid: Bringing up why there is a mid-March gap in accomplishments, or why there is a gap in accomplishments at home. Minnesota ended up with as many wins (5) in Compton Family Ice Arena this season as Notre Dame. Luckily, there is no regional in South Bend. The 9-2-1 road record helps, however, an extra home win or two would make an easier argument for a fourth Big Ten team.

Omaha:

Point out: The record. The Mavericks sit above .500 and have a better record (14-10-1) than Denver and several teams on the bubble. Perception matters and it helps UNO. Outside of an early 1-0 loss to Miami, Omaha has a consistent season with only the one bad loss, going 6-0-0 against Colorado College. The Mavericks also took two wins against North Dakota, going 2-4-0 in six games against the Fighting Hawks. UNO also has a higher goal margin than DU. Many of the arguments for the Mavericks are also the same ones that the women's hockey committee saw in Minnesota Duluth's favor. Maybe bring that up?

Avoid: The record. The math is closer than it seems because four of the wins came in overtime (compared to zero OT losses), leaving Omaha with 10 regulation wins. Denver, as mentioned previously, has the better head-to-head record with the Mavericks. Conference tournaments continue to be a thorn in the Mavericks' side, as an NCAA Tournament bid would be the fourth for Omaha since its last conference semifinal appearance two conferences ago. Two players on this year's Omaha team were not even born when the streak began (s/t Chris Dilks for this tidbit).

Penn State:

Point out: The Big Ten conference tournament results like this week is the only thing that matters. Hammer that home. Say nothing else. Just point out that and how the Nittany Lions beat Wisconsin the time before losing in OT. That Notre Dame win showed Penn State can play when healthy and not missing a month of play. If you guilt the committee about 2020 and say the Big Ten deserves four teams, and that the Nittany Lions are the fourth-best, maybe it will work? Stranger things have happened.

Avoid: Mentioning the 0-5 start, being swept by a combined 12-3 score to Notre Dame the week prior to the Big Ten conference tournament, the sub-.500 record, the fifth-place finish, the six regulation victories, and...at this point I've said too much. Brevity is key.

Providence:

Point out: How head-to-head put the Friars ahead. Against UMass Lowell, Providence won the only game. That helps when the two teams are competing for what might be one at-large bid. PC would also have a better record and zero OT wins compared to the RiverHawks. Against UConn, the Friars split the series, but took the all-important Hockey East conference tournament game and finished with the better record. While it does not need to be pointed out, PC has made its brand on finding ways in the NCAA Hockey Tournament.

Avoid: Bringing up weaknesses like bad losses. Math and RPI only care whether a win or loss occurs, but a human selection committee might look at 9-0 and 8-1 losses to BC and UMass, respectively and ask a few extra questions. At the same time, it would help if Massachusetts wins the Hockey East championship after defeating PC in the semifinals. Not much the Friars can do there besides pray and hope an at-large spot remains for Providence. It's just best to avoid. 

Quinnipiac: 

Point out: Of the remaining ECAC teams, Quinnipiac is by far the most deserving to make the NCAA Tournament. Even without an automatic bid. QU's 17-6-4  record stands out in most conferences. Leaving the Bobcats out if St. Lawrence wins pushes the boundaries of how many Eastern teams can make the 16-team NCAA Tournament.

Avoid: Mentioning that Bowling Green sweep. Yes, it keeps coming up, but the Bobcats are one of the few teams who played a true non-conference schedule, which includes a two-game sweep over three-loss AIC. Normally, that would be a good thing. This year? Take the gift and discuss the ECAC.

St. Lawrence:

Point out: A top-two ECAC conference tournament finish for future generations. The ECAC automatic bid if the Saints defeat Quinnipiac for its fifth win of the season. 

Avoid: Failing to win the ECAC automatic bid. Yes, it's a weird year. No, it's not that weird.

Related: 

2021 NCAA Men's Hockey Tournament Bracket 3.0

Bracketology 101: Five More Selection Questions + NCAA Tournament Locks & Bubble Teams

Bracketology 101: How Many Teams From Each Conference Make The Men's NCAA Hockey Tournament?

--

If you enjoyed this blog, you can follow Nate on Twitter and like/subscribe to his Facebook page. Thanks!

Thursday, July 25, 2019

60 Days. 60 Teams. 600 Words (or Less): Omaha

Omaha


2018-19 Record: 9-24-3 (5-17-2, T-7th in NCHC)
Head Coach: Mike Gabinet, 3rd Year
Top returning scorer: Taylor Ward (9G-18A)
Top returning goaltender: None

And then there's Omaha...

Today's featured team - whose opening line comes from a "very respected journalism site" in the words of USCHO - brings the NCHC into the "60 Days. 60 Teams. 600 Words (or Less)" series. The Mavericks spent the first Baxter Arena's first three seasons of existence around the .500 mark before dropping down to a single-digit win total and tied with Miami for last place in the NCHC.

Omaha's nine wins were sandwiched around an 0-6-1 start and 0-8-1 end to the season. When things went wrong, they stayed there.

Where the Mavericks, a season removed from contending for an NCAA Tournament berth, were able to somewhat live dangerously in 2017-18 by outscoring defensive issues (best shown by an 11-7 win over Miami), the good life did not repeat. The team once again finished near the bottom in team defense (59th of 60 teams). Technically improving ("only" giving up 3.74 goals per game), Omaha could not maintain the 3+ goals per game pace in 2018-19.

It'd be easy to pin the Mavericks' struggles on playing in a tough NCHC, but besides a sweep at home against Arizona State (who previously swept UNO as the teams played four games), the only other nonconference wins were against Alaska Anchorage.

What's New: Head coach Mike Gabinet has 12 freshmen arriving this fall, replacing a 10 person senior class who played key roles for the Mavericks over the last two seasons.

Perhaps nowhere is that more important than in goal. Matej Tomek's early departure means all three goaltenders will not be returning. In their place are three freshmen goalies on the roster, led by USHL Goaltender of the Year and Vegas Golden Knights draft pick (5th round of the 2019 NHL Draft) Isaiah Saville. The Anchorage, AK native should be the odds-on favorite to take over for longtime starter Evan Weninger with the Tomek experiment ending after the North Dakota transfer spent one year and all of five games in net.

Five forwards and four defensemen join the three goalies. (Sadly former UNO commit Ryan O'Reilly - no, not that one - isn't joining Teemu Pulkkinen - no, not that one either.) That includes Ryan Brushett, who led Powell River (BCHL) in scoring during his final year of juniors. The young forwards will need to help replace Omaha's top two scorers.

Closing Thoughts: Entering Year 3 of the Gabinet Era with a young, unproven team, we're still figuring out what exactly is the new Omaha sound. There's no denying the Mavericks have been entertaining the past two seasons. However, that philosophy hasn't exactly led to victories. It's difficult to rely on offensively outpowering the other team when being heavily outshot.

That personally is what will be intriguing over this season and the next because the 2015 Frozen Four team continues to get further and further in the rearview mirror. Can Gabinet get his players to play his style? Can Omaha improve during game situations and further develop? Does the defense find more consistency?

Having a full season of former Minnesota defenseman Nate Knoepke should help. Still, the team likely to rely upon its young players and hope Saville can become the next standout NCHC freshman goalie.

Recent 60 Days. 60 Teams. 600 Words (or Less) Features
Alaska
Robert Morris
Colgate
RPI
Every Team So Far

--
If you enjoyed this blog, you can follow Nate on Twitter and like/subscribe to his Facebook page. Thanks!